jump to navigation

Focus and Concentration May 16, 2009

Posted by nukemhill in General Interest.
add a comment

Another Times article:  The Science of Concentration.  Here’s an extended quote from the later part:

Ms. Gallagher advocates meditation to increase your focus, but she says there are also simpler ways to put the lessons of attention researchers to use. Once she learned how hard it was for the brain to avoid paying attention to sounds, particularly other people’s voices, she began carrying ear plugs with her. When you’re trapped in a noisy subway car or a taxi with a TV that won’t turn off, she says you have to build your own “stimulus shelter.”

She recommends starting your work day concentrating on your most important task for 90 minutes. At that point your prefrontal cortex probably needs a rest, and you can answer e-mail, return phone calls and sip caffeine (which does help attention) before focusing again. But until that first break, don’t get distracted by anything else, because it can take the brain 20 minutes to do the equivalent of rebooting after an interruption. (For more advice, go to nytimes.com/tierneylab.)

“Multitasking is a myth,” Ms. Gallagher said. “You cannot do two things at once. The mechanism of attention is selection: it’s either this or it’s that.” She points to calculations that the typical person’s brain can process 173 billion bits of information over the course of a lifetime.

“People don’t understand that attention is a finite resource, like money,” she said. “Do you want to invest your cognitive cash on endless Twittering or Net surfing or couch potatoing? You’re constantly making choices, and your choices determine your experience, just as William James said.” [emphasis mine]

Her book is Rapt, at Penguin.com.

Pogue on What’s *Really* Important in Technology May 16, 2009

Posted by nukemhill in Apple/AAPL, Technology, Video/Photography.
add a comment

NY Times article on what matters in technology–not what they tell you is important:

  1. Camcorders.  Out:  Zoom; In:  Wide-Angle.
  2. SLRs.  Out:  Megapixels; In:  Sensor-size.
  3. Cellphones.  Out:  Coverage; In:  Coverage.  The problem is, the coverage claims by the various providers sucks, no matter what.
  4. Computers.  Out:  Price; In:  Value.  (Gee, is he talking about Macs?  Yep.)